home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: inforamp.net!ts31-16
- From: crs0794@inforamp.net (Geoffrey Welsh)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: How come Z-Modem is faster than X-Modem?
- Date: 26 Mar 1996 03:02:56 GMT
- Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100
- Message-ID: <4j7mp0$l33@sam.inforamp.net>
- References: <4inro0$9mj@alcor.usc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts31-16.tor.inforamp.net
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <4inro0$9mj@alcor.usc.edu>, wawda@alcor.usc.edu (Abu Wawda) wrote:
- >I have the specs for the X-modem protocol and I see that it doesn't
- >add much overhead, just 4 bytes per 128 byte packet. So how come
- >Z-modem is so much faster? (Unfortunately, I haven't found the specs
- >for Z-Modem yet.) Does it do compression? Thanks,
-
- You're forgetting something very important that XMODEM adds: silence. After a
- packet is transmitted, XMODEM stops dead in its tracks until it gets a reply
- from the other end. When modems were 300 bps and it took a few seconds to
- send a single packet, the fraction of a second pause between packets didn't
- seem like much of a loss. With today's modems, the pause takes longer than
- the data transmission, resulting in more time wasted than used.
-
- ZMODEM, in its most common application, never stops sending.
-
- Oh, and yes... _full_ ZMODEM implementations include data compression, but
- with data compression built in to any decent modem these days, that's not very
- important.
-
- --
- Geoffrey Welsh, Developer, InSystems Technologies Inc.
- Temporary: crs0794@inforamp.net; At work: insystem@pathcom.com
- At home: geoff@zswamp.uucp or [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff
- Capitalism is a cold-hearted system which guards the interests of whoever's
- at the top, yet hypocritically claims that it offers everyone a fair shot.
- So is every other system ever put in place by man.
-